The Patriot Assignment | Get Homework Help

Developmentally Appropriate Practices Assignment | Get Homework Help
June 15, 2020
Criminal Justice Essay Assignment | College Homework Help
June 15, 2020

In this scene, the legislature is considering a vote regarding a levy to pay the American army to fight the British. In essence, before the colonies declared their independence as a whole, each state was voting on whether or not join the “Rebellion.” Benjamin Martin (played by Mel Gibson), a hero of the French and Indian War and someone whom everyone respects, gives the reasoning for his vote. Pay attention to all the speeches in this short clip. Does any of it sound familiar?

In this scene, Gabriel (played by Heath Ledger) has just entered town, where he is confronted by corpses hanging from a tree – a warning to those who would help in the fight against the British. The townspeople are gathered at the local church and are challenged by a young woman to stop talking – and start acting on their beliefs.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
The Patriot Assignment | Get Homework Help
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

(If you choose to watch the remainder of the movie, pay attention to phrases that include “principles.” Or the scene where one man asks another, “What would you do with freedom?” And near the end of the movie, ask yourself – do the ends justify the means?)

I tried to get the two clips, but it wouldn’t copy the url in the description.

Create an essay of at least 5 paragraphs
(1) Summarize the two scenes (separately) (10 points)

(2) As you watch these two scenes, pay attention to the idea of “principles” as it relates to freedom. Answer: What role do you think “principles” played in each of the scenes? (15 points)

(3) Compare espousing principles/ideals to actually acting upon them. (10 points)

(4) Answer: What beliefs/principles/ideals are you willing to act upon – and how? What would you be willing to risk to act upon those beliefs/principles/ideals? (10 points)

(5) Include an introduction (2.5 points) and a conclusion (2.5 points)

These points total 50. Deductions will be made if the additional instructions below are not followed – up to the point value in parentheses.

Additional instructions
(6) Cite your sources within the text. Anything that is not your original idea needs to be cited. (5 points)
(7) Include an APA formatted reference page, double-space your work, and indent your paragraphs. (5 points)
(8) Use college-level writing with proper grammar, punctuation, and syntax (2.5 points)

Save the essay as a Word document or PDF and Submit by Sunday 11:59pm.

The paper will go through Turnitin’s similarity index. Do not use someone’s words or ideas without proper punctuation, formatting, and citation. Doing so is plagiarism, a form of academic dishonesty with serious repercussions.

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Summary of Scenes
10.0 pts

Superior/Excellent
The two scenes were summarized separately, taking specific quotes or descriptions from each of the scenes. The reader is confident the writer watched each scene.
8.0 pts

Good
Both scenes are summarized, but not separately. Details/relevant quotes were used. Reader is confident writer watched both scenes.
6.0 pts

Satisfactory
The scenes are summarized but without details or quotes. Reader is not convinced writer watched both scenes.
4.0 pts
Attempt Made
A summary was given, but it appeared to be of the entire film, not the specific assigned scenes.
0.0 pts
No Credit
The rater did not see a summary of the scenes.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome “Principles”

Answer: What role do you think “principles” played in each of the scenes?
15.0 pts

Superior/Excellent
The question was answered using appropriate quotes from each scene, but each scene was addressed individually. A comparison or difference was recognized and understood. The argument made was logical and easy to follow.
12.0 pts

Good
The question was answered and used good support, but the scenes were not addressed separately/no comparison was made or differences recognized.
10.0 pts

Satisfactory
The question was answered but without good examples or support. Generalizations were made.
7.5 pts
Attempt Made
The writer attempted to answer the question, but the answer did not flow from the scenes or the argument was difficult to follow.
0.0 pts
No Credit
The rater did not see this element addressed.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Espousing v. Acting
Compare espousing principles/ideals to actually acting upon them.
10.0 pts

Excellent
The discussion recognizes the difference between espousing and acting on principles/ideals. Specific or general examples were used to demonstrate understanding.
7.5 pts
Attempt Made
The discussion clearly attempts to make the connection but falls short due to misunderstanding or lack of support or examples.
5.0 pts
Good Try

A paragraph was set aside to address this, but the argument was not clearly made, no support was given, and the main points were unclear.
0.0 pts
No Credit
The rater did not see this element addressed.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Personal Principles/Ideals

Answer: What beliefs/principles/ideals are you willing to act upon – and how? What would you be willing to risk to act upon those beliefs/principles/ideals?
10.0 pts

Superior/Excellent
All parts of the prompt were answered in a comprehensive manner. Which beliefs are worth acting upon? How would you act upon them? What would you be willing to risk? An understanding of risk is evident in the response.
9.0 pts

Good
2 parts of the question were answered – and an understanding of risk is evident in the response.
7.5 pts

Satisfactory
One of the following is true: Only 1 part of the prompt was addressed An understanding of risk was not evident
5.0 pts
Attempt Made
There was an obvious attempt, but the prompt was not satisfied, the understanding was unclear OR the discussion was difficult to follow.
0.0 pts
No Credit
The rater did not see this element addressed.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction
2.5 pts

Excellent
Strong introduction with thesis or hook to engage the reader.
2.0 pts

Good
Introduction discusses the film and the word “principles.”
1.75 pts

Satisfactory
Introduction simply outlines the main points or sections of the essay.
1.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
The introduction is only one sentence, was part of the first body paragraph OR seems like an afterthought.
0.0 pts
No Credit
The rater did not see an introduction.
2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion
2.5 pts

Excellent
Strong conclusion that flows from the body of the paper and sums the essay up nicely — WITHOUT a recap.
1.75 pts

Satisfactory
Conclusion simply recaps the main points of the paper or prompt.
1.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No distinct conclusion but instead part of last body paragraph, was only one sentence, did not flow from the rest of the essay, and/or seemed like an afterthought.
0.0 pts No Credit
The rater did not see a conclusion. 2.5 pts

Total Points: 50.0

Two pages of content and add reference page for third page.

                                                                                Place Order