Case Study: Opening Your New Dunkin’ Donuts Locations Assignment | Online Homework HelpJune 14, 2020
Explain how talk is Shaped by Context Assignment | Online AssignmentJune 14, 2020
It is suggested that you adopt the following format in presenting your SBP:
- Title Page: Please use the standard cover page attached as per prescribed in SBP Handbook.
- Abstract: It should provide a brief summary of the SBP not exceeding 300 words
- Acknowledgements: Acknowledgements of outside help and support.
- Table of Contents: It should list the sequence with page numbers of all relevant
subdivisions of the dissertation; i.e. chapter headings, section and sub-section (if
- List of Tables
- List of Figures / Illustrations
- Chapter 1: Introduction
- Chapter 2: Literature Review
- Chapter 3: Theoretical Framework and Research Methodology
- Chapter 4: Data Presentation, Analysis and Findings
- Chapter 5: Conclusion (s) and Recommendations
- Reference List: The S B should include a list of all relevant texts / journals used following
the Harvard Referencing System / Style. Please refer to Referencing Guide .
- Appendices: The appendices should only include material that is not central to the
arguments in the main text.
GRADING AND ASSESSMENT
Your written dissertation will be marked by your supervisor, 2
nd marked by
a n o t h e r s u p e r v i s o r , and finally verified by the External Examiner. The
SBPitself will be worth 75% of the module marks.
The criteria for assessment are shown below. Specifically, your S B P will be
graded according to the following:
- Abstract, introduction, continuity and presentation (15%)
In general, your markers will assess the clarity of stated aims and objectives,
relevance to sector related issues, feasibility of aims of SBP, the rationale and
significance of the research undertaken.
a. Title: is the title focused, summative, and does it reflect the proposed
S B P content?
b. Abstract: is it short (300 words), self-contained, summative, objective,
precise and easy to read.
c. Introduction: is background information included? Is an introduction
to current research included and developed? An introduction to the
organisation (if applicable)?
d. Have you demonstrated the relevance of your SBP to the field and is
it theoretically grounded? Links to relevant literature and academic
debates, the evidence of extensive reading will be valued.
e. Aim(s): is the aim feasible and manageable (have resource and data
accessibility been taken into account)? Is the aim original and does it
have the potential to add insights to the field of study? Does it conform
to the right aim format?
f. Rationale and Significance of Study: is the sound rationale to
undertake the study included? Are the benefits / significance of this
- Literature Review (25%)
In general: Search for relevant literature. Critical assessment of literature.
Awareness of contribution of other researchers. Awareness of relevant
theories, concepts, models and methodology. Direct linkage to SBP aims and
a. Provide a critical review of relevant academic literature
b. Critique existing research and link it to aims / objectives
c. Review key academic theories
d. Demonstrate relevance to contemporary / current debates
e. Be current (not outdated sources)
f. Be related to previous published and “recognised” work
g. Be critical (sources that both support and oppose aims and objectives)
h. Be able to differentiate fact and opinion
i. Assess strengths and weaknesses of previous work
j. Be objective, unbiased, coherent and cohesive
k. Adhere to the Harvard Referencing System
- Theoretical Framework and Research Methodology (20%)
In general: Choice and use of research methods are appropriate to the aims and
objectives. Sound justification provided, including evidence of secondary data
supporting choice of methods.
a. The type (s) of research undertaken
b. The theoretical / conceptual framework
c. The research methods
d. The research design
e. The data collection (i.e. sampling)
f. Ethical issues
g. Reliability and validity of the study
- Data Presentation, Analysis and Results/Findings (30%)
In general: Presentation, analysis and interpretation of data followed by your
findings. Clear relationship made between aims & objectives, literature and
a. Is the data appropriately presented i.e. graphically (quantitative
research) or verbatim (qualitative research)?
b. Is the data presentation factual or interpretative?
c. Does the analysis answer the research questions?
d. Does the analysis relate or is linked to previous knowledge in the
e. Is the analysis built from the findings?
f. Is the analysis linked to the literature review?
g. Is the analysis analytical or merely descriptive?
- Conclusions and Recommendations (10%)
In general: Aims and objectives are satisfied and appropriate course (s) of action
is / are recommended.
a. Are the conclusions drawn from the findings?
b. Are the conclusions linked to the literature?
c. Are the conclusions linked to aims and objectives?
d. Are the suggested recommendations linked to the
deficiencies identified in the research findings?
e. Are the suggested recommendations practical and workable?
From the above, it should be clear that examiners not only consider the technical
merit of a SBP, but also the logical development of argument. Students need
to demonstrate interpretative skills and show the ability to study a problem in
depth adopting a critical and analytical manner. Work that is descriptive,
superficial and lacking direction will not be graded highly.
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Strategic Business Project Structure and Contents Assignment | Cheap Essay Services
Just from $13/Page